| |
 |
 |
 |
|
Past Projects
Back to Current Projects
|
|
"N vs P
limitation of benthic primary production in Florida Bay: a manipulative
experiment" |
Funding Agency: U.S. Geological Survey
PI: James W. Fourqurean (FIU)
Co-PI's: Ken Heck,
Michael B. Robblee (USGS-BRD)
Freshwater discharge into Florida Bay brings not only freshwater,
but Everglades-derived nutrients as well. Recently, it has been
suggested that an increase in freshwater flow, as envisioned in
the Everglades Restoration Plan, would increase N loading into
Florida Bay, and therefore cause increased microalgal growth and
loss of seagrass beds. Implicit in this hypothesis is the notion
that N limits biomass of primary producers in sections of
Florida Bay. This project is manipulating the availability of N
and P to seagrass beds in selected regions of Florida Bay and
measuring the response of the major primary producers and
consumers to this nutrient manipulation.
The goals of this project are to determine the limiting nutrient
for benthic primary producers in Florida Bay and to asses the
likely impact of increases in N and P availability on
seagrass-dominated benthic communities. We will also assess the
changes in population structure of small consumer organisms as a
function of nutrient availability.
|
|
|
|
"The
role of habitat fragmentation on the structure and function of seagrass
ecosystems in the northern Gulf of Mexico" |
Funding Agency: EPA Gulf of Mexico Program and MS/AL Sea Grant
PI: Ken Heck
PhD. Dissertation: Matthew Johnson
The result of the global decline in seagrass meadows is the
fragmentation of once continuous seagrass beds into smaller
functional units. This fragmentation can alter patch size and shape,
ultimately altering the perimeter: area (P/A) ratio (i.e. the amount
"edge" present), which in turn, may impact faunal abundance,
biological interactions, and water flow. Of the few studies
examining these trends, there is little agreement on the exact
consequences of shifts in patch shape and/or size on seagrass beds.
To better understand how communities are
impacted by changes in patch size
and shape, there is a need to isolate and examine the controlling
mechanisms at work. To date, most research has done little to
separate the role of colonization from the confounding effects of
post-settlement processes (i.e. predation). Within seagrass beds,
potential changes could be controlled or compensated for by shifts
in colonization rates of juveniles and adults,
recruitment/settlement of larvae, growth rates, or predation rates.
The goals of my work are to examine how changes in patch size and
patch shape influence community structure of macrofaunal organisms
in seagrass beds, and to examine the effects of changes in patch
size and patch shape on larval settlement rates and post-settlement
processes. Specific objectives are to: 1. Evaluate the effects of
seagrass bed size, shape and degree of isolation on the composition,
abundance and secondary production of macrofaunal seagrass
communities, 2. Isolate and evaluate the specific role the patch
size and shape plays on settlement, predation/survival, habitat
preference, and growth of seagrass associated macrofauna, 3.
Determine if seagrass bed size, shape, and degree of isolation can
impact the above ground biomass, and leaf characteristics of
associated seagrasses.
|
|
|
|
"Human-induced
changes in the cross-habitat flow of energy in a subtropical
marine ecosystem: experimental assessments using newly created
marine reserves in the Florida Keys" (Conducted in the Upper Keys)
|
Funding Agency: Nature Conservancy/ Mellon Foundation
PI: John F. Valentine
Co-PI's: Ken Heck,
Michael Beck
Scientists and conservationists alike are increasingly concerned
that the harvesting of large predatory fishes has caused
significant alterations in the structure and function of marine
ecosystems. Marine reserves are being used as tool to address
this problem, but there has been little examination of (i) how
fishing has altered food webs on reefs and adjacent habitats or
(ii) how landscape-scale considerations should be included in
the design of reserves. In addition, most reserves are small,
unreplicated, designed around just one habitat type (usually a
coral reef),and studies of marine reserves overlook the
connectivity between coral reef and adjacent seagrass habitats,
as well as the importance of reef structural complexity and
geometry on the re-establishment of large predators.
We are taking advantage of the rare opportunity to use replicated
"no-take" (predator rich) and unprotected (predator poor) reefs
in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to assess the
impact of large piscivorous fishes on food web structure in and
around coral reefs, the importance of linkages among seagrass
and coral reefs in the reestablishment of these food webs, and
the effects of habitat structure (complexity and fragmentation
of reefs) on the success of marine reserves. We predict (i) that
there will be dramatic increases in the size and density of
predatory fishes not just on protected reefs, but also in
seagrass habitats adjacent to protected reefs and that this
benefit will decrease with distance from protection, (ii) that
there will dramatic decreases in both the size and survivorship
of many marine invertebrates in seagrass habitats adjacent to
protected reefs, as reef predators transfer productivity from
seagrasses to reefs, and (iii) that more structurally complex
reefs that are less fragmented will show greater densities and
diversities of reef fish. This research will help inform
scientists, managers, and conservationists about the importance
of linkages among habitats and landscape-scale considerations in
the design of tropical marine reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
"Marine
reserve effectiveness in restoring coastal food webs: an
experimental test using special protection areas and an
ecological reserve in the Florida Keys National Marine
Sanctuary" (Conducted in the Lower Keys)
|
|
Funding Agency: NOAA (MARFIN)
PI: John F. Valentine
Co-PI's: Ken Heck
Scientists and conservationists alike are increasingly concerned
that the harvesting of large predatory fishes has caused
significant alterations in the structure and function of marine
ecosystems. Marine reserves are being used as tool to address
this problem, but there has been little examination of (i) how
fishing has altered food webs on reefs and adjacent habitats or
(ii) how landscape-scale considerations should be included in
the design of reserves. In addition, most reserves are small,
unreplicated, designed around just one habitat type (usually a
coral reef),and studies of marine reserves overlook the
connectivity between coral reef and adjacent seagrass habitats,
as well as the importance of reef structural complexity and
geometry on the re-establishment of large predators.
We are taking advantage of the rare opportunity to use
replicated "no-take" (predator rich) and unprotected (predator
poor) reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to
assess the impact of large piscivorous fishes on food web
structure in and around coral reefs, the importance of linkages
among seagrass and coral reefs in the reestablishment of these
food webs, and the effects of habitat structure (complexity and
fragmentation of reefs) on the success of marine reserves. We
predict (i) that there will be dramatic increases in the size
and density of predatory fishes not just on protected reefs, but
also in seagrass habitats adjacent to protected reefs and that
this benefit will decrease with distance from protection, (ii)
that there will dramatic decreases in both the size and
survivorship of many marine invertebrates in seagrass habitats
adjacent to protected reefs, as reef predators transfer
productivity from seagrasses to reefs, and (iii) that more
structurally complex reefs that are less fragmented will show
greater densities and diversities of reef fish. This research
will help inform scientists, managers, and conservationists
about the importance of linkages among habitats and
landscape-scale considerations in the design of tropical marine
reserves. |
|
|
|
"Predicting
Seagrass Survival in Nutrient Enriched Waters: Toward a New View
of An Existing Paradigm"
|
|
Funding Agency: Alabama Center for Estuarine Studies
(Environmental Protection Agency)
PI: Ken Heck
Co-PI's: Jonathan Pennock (UNH),
John F. Valentine (DISL), Patricia M. Spitzer
The goal of this project is to test the generality of previous
experimental studies, including our own, that found that
consumption by small herbivores could greatly reduce the
incidence of algal overgrowth in eutrophic coastal waters. We
are focusing on seagrass-dominated ecosystems because they are
well-documented to serve as nursery habitats for a broad variety
of economically valuable finfish and shellfish (see Heck et al.
1997 and Williams and Heck 2001 for reviews), and because
eutrophication is strongly implicated in the disappearance of
these critically important habitats in the Gulf of Mexico, and
the nation as a whole (e.g., Howarth et al. 2000; Bricker et al.
1999). We are testing the ability of different types of small
grazers (both individually and collectively) to buffer the
effects of eutrophication by conducting field studies at small
spatial scales that will allow us to sustain elevated nutrient
concentrations at levels that will mimic those of up to the most
highly eutrophic of coastal waters. Therefore, we will test the
degree to which different types and abundances of herbivores can
explain the observed variation in algal responses to
eutrophication.
|
|
|